Syrian Opposition's Optimism Following Trump's Victory
In the wake of Donald Trump's recent presidential victory, the Syrian opposition expresses cautious optimism regarding the future of U.S. involvement in Syria. Leaders within the Syrian Interim Government, including Abdul Rahman Mustafa, believe that Trump's administration may adopt a more serious approach to the ongoing Syrian conflict. Mustafa emphasized that the changes in U.S. leadership could open doors for renewed political engagement and support for the aspirations of the Syrian people. He highlighted the need for accountability and justice against the so-called 'Captagon regime' and hopes for a revitalization of the stalled political solution.
Expectations for U.S. Policy Toward Syria
Despite the optimism, opposition leaders remain wary of relying solely on Trump's past threats against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Mustafa noted that while specific actions are uncertain, the overall approach of the new administration is crucial. Hadi al-Bahra, head of the Syrian National Coalition, indicated that he does not foresee immediate changes in U.S. policies, which are expected to maintain pressure on the Syrian regime through sanctions and diplomatic measures. Al-Bahra believes that a strict U.S. stance could potentially create opportunities for a more active political process regarding Syria, although he acknowledges that the Syrian issue may not be a top priority for the Trump administration.
Concerns Over U.S. Military Withdrawal
Colonel Mustafa Bakour, spokesperson for the 'Jaysh al-Izza' faction, shared insights on the implications of a potential U.S. military withdrawal from Syria. He expressed concerns that such a move could lead to increased control by Turkish or Iranian forces in the region. Bakour suggested that any decision to withdraw would likely require negotiations with Ankara to prevent a power vacuum that could benefit hostile factions. He also speculated that Trump's business-oriented mindset might influence decisions regarding Assad, depending on perceived U.S. interests and potential costs associated with such actions.
