Netanyahu's political survival is intricately linked to the ongoing conflict, as it distracts from domestic challenges he faces.
The lack of a diplomatic horizon suggests a prolonged conflict, which may further exacerbate humanitarian issues in Gaza.
The international community's response, particularly from the United States, could influence the dynamics of the conflict and Netanyahu's strategy moving forward.
If Netanyahu remains in power, the conflict in Gaza may continue indefinitely, leading to further humanitarian crises.
Increased military actions may provoke stronger international condemnation, potentially impacting Israel's diplomatic relations.
The potential for a shift in U.S. foreign policy under future administrations could alter the support Israel receives, affecting its military strategies.
Amos Harel, a military analyst for Haaretz, has raised concerns regarding Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's intentions in the ongoing conflict in the Gaza Strip. Harel suggests that Netanyahu is pursuing an 'endless war' to serve his personal political interests rather than seeking a resolution. He argues that the military threat from Hamas has been significantly diminished, yet the government shows no intention of pursuing diplomatic solutions, which could lead to a ceasefire or peace agreement.
Harel emphasizes that the continuation of the conflict benefits Netanyahu by diverting attention from pressing issues such as early elections, potential inquiries into the failures of the October 7 attack, and his upcoming criminal trial. He notes that Netanyahu's close advisor, Major General Yaakov Amidror, indicated that Israel would maintain its military presence in Gaza even after the war, suggesting a long-term strategy rather than a resolution.
The situation in Gaza has resulted in a humanitarian crisis, with reports of over 147,000 Palestinian casualties, including a significant number of children and women, since the escalation of violence began on October 7, 2023. Harel's analysis points to a troubling trend where military actions are prioritized over diplomatic efforts, raising concerns about the future of peace in the region.
