Iran's Nuclear Doctrine and Missile Range: A Shift in Strategy
Amid escalating tensions between Iran and Israel, Kamal Kharrazi, head of the Strategic Council for Foreign Relations in Iran, has reaffirmed that revising Iran's nuclear doctrine and missile range remains a viable option. This statement comes in light of a recent Israeli military attack on Iranian targets, which has heightened fears of a direct confrontation between the two nations. Kharrazi emphasized that Iran is considering the sensitivities of Europe while evaluating its military capabilities, indicating a potential shift in strategy if European security concerns are not addressed.
In a meeting with Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, a student urged for a change in the nuclear doctrine, to which Khamenei responded affirmatively, asserting that Iran would arm itself adequately to confront perceived threats. The Iranian leadership's rhetoric suggests a readiness to escalate military preparedness in response to external pressures, particularly from Israel and the West.
Implications of Changing Nuclear Doctrine
The backdrop of these developments includes Iran's ongoing struggle with international sanctions and a deteriorating economy, evidenced by a significant rise in the value of the US dollar against the Iranian toman. Analysts suggest that Iran's missile range has been intentionally limited to avoid provoking European nations, particularly Germany, which is seen as a key ally of Israel. Kharrazi's remarks signal a warning to Europe about the implications of ignoring Iran's security concerns.
Political researcher Bardia Attaran noted that Iran's historical attempts to negotiate with Western powers have largely been unsuccessful, leading to a strategic pivot towards establishing a deterrence mechanism known as the 'Axis of Resistance.' This approach aims to bolster Iran's national security and military capabilities in the face of perceived threats, particularly from Israel. Attaran warns that if Israel continues to expand its military threats, Iran may have no choice but to fundamentally alter its nuclear policies to ensure its defense.
