Fethullah Gülen's death may lead to a power struggle within his organization, potentially impacting its operations worldwide.
The U.S. government's involvement in selecting the new leader of the Gülen organization could shape its future direction and influence.
The historical parallels drawn between Gülen and figures like Hasan-i Sabbah highlight the complex nature of modern political and intelligence networks.
The internal conflict within the Gülen organization could weaken its influence as factions emerge over leadership.
The U.S. may reassess its relationship with the Gülen organization depending on the outcomes of the leadership struggle.
Increased scrutiny and potential crackdowns on the Gülen organization may occur in countries where it operates, as governments respond to its controversial history.
On October 21, 2024, the Fethullah Gülen organization officially announced the death of its founder, Fethullah Gülen, on October 20, 2024. This event marks a significant turning point for the organization, which has operated across more than 100 countries and has been linked to various political and intelligence activities. Gülen, who moved to the United States in 1999, established a vast network of educational institutions and commercial enterprises, while his organization has been accused of orchestrating a failed military coup in Turkey in 2016. Following his death, internal conflicts within the organization are anticipated as members vie for control over Gülen's estimated billions in assets, including real estate. Observers suggest that the U.S. government will play a crucial role in determining the new leadership amidst concerns about the organization's future influence.
The Gülen organization, often referred to as a secretive and influential network, has been described as operating with methods akin to those of historical figures like Hasan-i Sabbah. The organization has faced scrutiny for its alleged connections to intelligence operations, including claims of using blackmail and illegal surveillance. Despite the Turkish government's efforts to dismantle the organization following the coup attempt, it remains active in various regions, including Asia, Africa, and the Middle East, often aligning its interests with those of the U.S. and Israel. As the organization navigates this leadership transition, its capacity to influence global politics remains a topic of concern.
