The use of ATACMS signifies a shift in Ukraine's strategy to target Russian military infrastructure directly, potentially altering the dynamics of the conflict.
The demand for PrSM highlights Ukraine's need for more advanced weaponry to maintain pressure on Russian forces, but logistical and training challenges may hinder effective deployment.
The ongoing conflict underscores the complexities of international military support, as the U.S. balances its own military readiness with the needs of Ukraine.
If Ukraine successfully integrates PrSM into its arsenal, it could enhance its ability to conduct long-range strikes, potentially shifting the war's dynamics further.
Continued military pressure on Russia may lead to escalated responses, complicating the situation for both Ukraine and NATO allies.
The war may remain in a stalemate unless significant changes occur in military strategy or external support, particularly in terms of personnel and advanced weaponry.
Ukraine has successfully struck the Russian mainland for the second time using U.S.-supplied ATACMS missiles, targeting the Kalinin Air Base in Kursk on November 25. This marks the first attack on an air base with these missiles, following a previous strike on a military facility in Bryansk on November 19. Despite the attacks, reports indicate limited damage at the Kalinin Air Base, which has not been a major operational site for some time. The U.S. had previously restricted Ukraine's use of ATACMS against Russian targets but lifted these restrictions in response to Russia's deployment of North Korean troops in the region.
In addition to the ATACMS, Ukraine is now seeking the new Precision Strike Missile (PrSM), which has a range of over 400 kilometers and a greater payload capacity compared to ATACMS. This demand comes as the U.S. is hesitant to provide more military support, focusing instead on replenishing its own stockpiles. The PrSM is seen as a potential game-changer for Ukraine, allowing for more effective long-range strikes against Russian positions.
Despite the recent successes with ATACMS, analysts express skepticism about their impact on the overall war effort. The lack of trained personnel remains a significant challenge for Ukraine, and while the U.S. may support Ukraine in not losing the war, the goal of achieving a decisive victory remains elusive.
