The ceasefire agreement is seen as a politically risky move for Netanyahu, who is criticized from both the right and left for different reasons.
The involvement of the United States in brokering the ceasefire highlights its role as a key player in Middle Eastern diplomacy.
The agreement's success will depend on Hezbollah's compliance and the Israeli government's ability to manage public perception amid ongoing security concerns.
If the ceasefire holds, it could lead to a temporary reduction in hostilities in the region, but tensions may resurface if Hezbollah rebuilds its military capabilities.
Netanyahu's political future may hinge on the effectiveness of this ceasefire and the government's ability to address public safety concerns in northern Israel.
The situation in Gaza remains precarious, and any perceived failure to secure hostages could further undermine Netanyahu's position.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced a ceasefire agreement with Hezbollah in Lebanon, effective Wednesday morning. The agreement, facilitated by the United States, aims to halt hostilities after two months of conflict that escalated following exchanges of fire related to the Israeli offensive in Gaza. President Joe Biden confirmed the truce, emphasizing its importance for regional stability and Israel's security, while also calling for a ceasefire in Gaza. The ceasefire includes a sixty-day truce and the withdrawal of Hezbollah fighters from the area between the Litani River and the Israeli border, with the Lebanese army and UN peacekeepers set to take their place. However, Netanyahu faces significant backlash from right-wing factions within Israel, who view the agreement as a surrender rather than a victory, with polls indicating that a majority of the public feels Israel has not defeated Hezbollah. Netanyahu's government is under pressure to justify the agreement, especially given the ongoing hostage situation involving Hamas.
