Russian Defense Ministry Prepares Response to Ukrainian ATACMS Strikes
The Russian Ministry of Defense has announced that it is preparing a response to recent Ukrainian attacks using American-made ATACMS missiles, which targeted military positions in the Kursk region. Over the past few days, Ukrainian forces have launched a total of 13 missiles in two separate strikes, prompting a heightened state of alert within the Russian military.
On November 23, a five-missile attack was directed at an S-400 anti-aircraft missile division near Lotaryovka, resulting in damage to radar systems and casualties among personnel. The Russian defense systems managed to intercept three of the missiles, but two reached their target. Following this, on November 25, eight ATACMS missiles were fired at the Kursk-Vostochny airfield, with seven intercepted and one causing minor injuries to servicemen and slight infrastructure damage. The Russian Ministry has confirmed that these attacks were conducted using ATACMS missiles, underscoring the increasing reliance on Western weaponry by Ukraine.
Escalation Concerns and NATO's Stance
The situation has drawn significant attention, with U.S. officials acknowledging that Ukraine has been granted permission to use ATACMS missiles for self-defense. White House Strategic Communications Coordinator John Kirby stated that the current use of these missiles is a response to threats in the Kursk region. Meanwhile, the Kremlin has expressed concerns about the escalating conflict, attributing part of the blame to U.S. involvement. Dmitry Peskov, the press secretary for the Russian president, indicated that the U.S. administration is fostering further escalation rather than seeking resolution.
In a related development, NATO has discussed the possibility of conducting preventive strikes on Russian territory should armed conflict escalate. Admiral Rob Bauer, head of NATO's Military Committee, emphasized the need for the alliance to enhance its operational capabilities and air defense systems, suggesting a shift in NATO's traditional defensive posture. This evolving military landscape raises questions about the potential for increased hostilities in the region as both sides prepare for possible retaliatory actions.
