The rapid success of the Syrian opposition highlights the significant decline in the Syrian army's operational capabilities, particularly in the absence of Russian air support.
The operation reflects broader regional dynamics, including the shifting allegiances and military strategies of various factions involved in the Syrian conflict.
Turkey's support for the opposition and its strategic interests in the region play a crucial role in the unfolding events, indicating a complex interplay of international relations.
The outcome of this military operation may lead to significant changes in the geopolitical landscape of the region, affecting not only Syria but also neighboring countries.
The Syrian opposition may continue to capitalize on the regime's weaknesses, potentially leading to further territorial gains in the coming weeks.
The decline in Iranian and Russian support for the Assad regime could prompt a reevaluation of military strategies among allied forces.
Increased instability in the region may lead to heightened conflicts involving various factions, including Hezbollah and Israeli forces.
The evolving situation may influence Turkey's future actions regarding its relationship with both the opposition and the Assad regime.
In a surprising turn of events, the Syrian opposition successfully expelled the Syrian army from several provinces within just seven days, following the launch of a military operation named 'Deterrence of Aggression.' This operation, initiated by opposition factions in Idlib, led to significant territorial gains and the collapse of regime forces, raising questions about the readiness and capabilities of the Syrian army. The absence of Russian air support, a key ally of the Assad regime, further complicated the situation, allowing opposition forces to advance rapidly.
The operation was meticulously planned over five months, culminating in a coordinated attack that began on November 27. The first day saw the capture of numerous villages in the western countryside of Aleppo, with the regime's defensive lines crumbling under pressure. Analysts attribute the regime's withdrawal to a combination of internal dissent, reduced support from Russia and Iran, and the strategic withdrawal of Hezbollah fighters to Lebanon due to ongoing conflicts with Israel.
The opposition's swift gains are indicative of effective planning and execution, as they capitalized on the regime's weakened state. The operation aimed not only to reclaim territory but also to strike at Iranian influence in the region, particularly in Aleppo, which Iran considers a critical area for its national security. The opposition's approach has been notably cautious, with no reported violations against civilians in the areas they have captured.
