MP Frédéric Maillot Advocates for Change in Terminology Related to Work
In a recent session of the National Assembly, GDR (Democratic and Republican Left) MP Frédéric Maillot raised a thought-provoking issue regarding the terminology used to describe illegal employment. During discussions on Article 3 of the 2025 finance bill, Maillot challenged his colleagues to reconsider the expression "black work," which he argues carries a negative connotation and could be viewed as racially insensitive. He proposed replacing it with the term "concealed work" to avoid perpetuating negative stereotypes associated with the word "black."
Maillot, representing La Réunion, emphasized the importance of language in shaping perceptions, stating, "Without making a value judgment, why talk about undeclared work?" He expressed concern that terms like "black list" and "black sheep" contribute to a negative framing of the word "black" in society. His comments were met with applause, suggesting a level of support for his call to reexamine the language used in political discourse.
Historical Context of the Term
The term "black work" has historical roots dating back to the Middle Ages when it referred to illegal labor performed at night. According to Valérie Gontero-Lauze, a lecturer in medieval language and literature at the University of Aix-Marseille, the expression "travailler au noir" originally described work done outside of regulated hours, which was not tolerated. Over time, the term has evolved to encompass any form of undeclared work. Maillot's remarks highlight the need to understand the historical context of such expressions and their implications in modern discourse.
Reactions in the Assembly
The proposal sparked a lively debate among members of the National Assembly, with some finding humor in the suggestion while others engaged in serious discussion about the implications of language in legislative contexts. Maillot's initiative aligns with his ongoing efforts to address linguistic discrimination, a topic he previously explored in a conference with fellow MP Olivier Serva from Guadeloupe. The discussions surrounding this terminology reflect a broader movement toward more inclusive language in politics and society.