The ongoing negotiations reflect Lebanon's strategic focus on sovereignty and adherence to international resolutions.
The absence of a response from Israel raises questions about the future of the ceasefire agreement.
Khalil's statements indicate a united front among Lebanese factions regarding the negotiations and the importance of Resolution 1701.
If Israel responds positively to the ceasefire proposal, it could lead to a significant de-escalation in tensions in the region.
Failure to reach an agreement may result in continued hostilities and further complications for Lebanon's sovereignty.
The involvement of international observers could enhance the monitoring of the ceasefire and implementation of Resolution 1701.
Ali Hassan Khalil, the political aide to Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, announced that Lebanon has reached an agreement with US envoy Amos Hochstein regarding a vision for a ceasefire. This proposal has been communicated to Israel, but no response has been received yet. Khalil emphasized that adherence to UN Resolution 1701 is crucial for Lebanon in any potential agreement, and any deviation from this resolution will be unacceptable. He noted that indirect communications between Berri and Hochstein have been ongoing, facilitated by the US embassy in Beirut and other channels. Khalil expressed hope for a swift agreement, highlighting Lebanon's commitment to its sovereignty and the resolution's provisions, which include a ceasefire and the withdrawal of Israeli forces from breached border areas. He stated that all Lebanese factions support this stance, and Hezbollah will comply with any agreement reached by Berri, provided it aligns with Lebanon's interests. Khalil also rejected any Israeli interference in Lebanon's borders and asserted that Israel's military actions have failed to achieve their objectives.
