Israeli Forces in Gaza: A Violation of Peace Treaties
Former Egyptian Assistant Foreign Minister Ambassador Hussein Haridi has raised significant concerns regarding the presence of Israeli forces in the Philadelphi (Salah El-Din) axis, deeming it a violation of the peace treaty signed between Egypt and Israel. Haridi emphasized that this breach particularly contravenes the security annex of the treaty, which was designed to ensure stability in the region.
Political Maneuvering or Genuine Security Concerns?
In a recent interview with Al Jazeera, Haridi discussed the implications of Israeli leaders' statements regarding the occupation of the Gaza Strip. He pointed out that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has expressed a desire for Israeli forces to remain in Gaza for the next decade, ostensibly for Israel's security. However, Haridi speculated that this assertion might be a political maneuver rather than a genuine security strategy.
Egypt's Role in Managing the Rafah Crossing
Haridi also highlighted Egypt's position amid the ongoing conflict, noting that Cairo is working within a defined framework that allows Palestinian parties to manage the Rafah crossing. This approach aims to maintain Egyptian sovereignty while leaving the diplomatic discussions with Israel to the United States. Furthermore, Haridi criticized Netanyahu's claims regarding weapon smuggling across the Egyptian border, stating that these allegations reflect an attempt to evade responsibility for Israel's failures during the recent conflict.
- Ambassador Hussein Haridi's insights shed light on the broader implications of Israeli military presence in Gaza, particularly in the context of Egyptian-Israeli relations. The peace treaty, established to foster cooperation and security, is at risk as tensions escalate. Haridi's analysis suggests that the rhetoric from Israeli leaders may be more about domestic politics than actual security needs, indicating a complex interplay of regional dynamics. Moreover, Egypt's management of the Rafah crossing is crucial not only for humanitarian reasons but also for maintaining its sovereignty and regional influence. As the situation continues to evolve, the international community watches closely, particularly the role of the United States in mediating discussions for a ceasefire.
