The article underscores the complex interplay between military conflict and domestic political stability in Israel.
It highlights the paradox of Netanyahu's strengthened political position amid ongoing violence, raising questions about the future of democracy in Israel.
The notion of 'eternal war' as a strategy to maintain internal unity reflects a significant shift in societal values, prioritizing survival over democratic principles.
If the war continues, the erosion of democratic norms may lead to the rise of more authoritarian governance in Israel.
The potential for civil unrest could increase as societal divisions deepen in the aftermath of prolonged military conflict.
The future of Israeli society may hinge on the balance between military engagement and the preservation of democratic values.
Is Tel Aviv Prolonging War to Avert Civil Conflict?
In a recent article published in Haaretz, writer Rogel Alpher posits that the ongoing war led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government is not merely a military engagement with external adversaries but a strategic maneuver to delay a potential civil war within Israel. Alpher argues that what he terms the 'eternal war' serves Netanyahu's political interests by bolstering his position in the aftermath of the October 7 attacks, which paradoxically strengthened his authority rather than undermining it.
Political Implications of the 'Eternal War'
Alpher highlights that Israeli democracy was already fragile prior to the conflict, as Netanyahu faced corruption charges and refused to resign. The writer emphasizes that instead of transitioning to a phase of peace and stability post-conflict, Israeli society may find itself on the brink of internal strife. He claims that many Israelis perceive the ongoing war as a preferable alternative to civil unrest, sacrificing lives and economic stability for the sake of national unity.
The Future of Israeli Democracy
The continuation of the war, according to Alpher, is eroding liberal values in Israel. He notes that military personnel who previously opposed serving under Netanyahu for democratic reasons are now implicated in actions that conflict with those values. Furthermore, escalating settler violence and increased Israeli control over territories are contributing to a decline in the rule of law. Alpher warns that if the war persists, Israel risks a complete democratic collapse, potentially transforming into a religious and autocratic regime aligned with extreme right-wing ideologies. He concludes by stating that the current conflict may not only be a security measure but also a harbinger of a civil war that could deeply divide Israeli society.
