The call for support of Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham reflects a shift in perspective regarding groups previously labeled as terrorist organizations, highlighting the complexities of the Syrian conflict.
The emphasis on avoiding the mistakes made in Afghanistan suggests a growing awareness among Western policymakers of the long-term consequences of military interventions.
The ongoing threat of unexploded ordnance in Syria underscores the humanitarian crisis that persists long after active conflict has ceased.
If Western nations reconsider their stance on Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham, it may lead to a realignment of power dynamics within Syria.
Increased support for local governance structures could stabilize regions previously controlled by extremist factions, potentially reducing violence.
The international community may face pressure to address the humanitarian crisis in Syria more effectively, particularly concerning unexploded ordnance and civilian safety.
International newspapers have urged Western nations to learn from their past mistakes in Afghanistan and avoid similar pitfalls in Syria. They emphasize the importance of supporting Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham, suggesting that it may no longer fit the criteria for a terrorist organization. The Wall Street Journal highlighted former US Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford's views, which argue for a reassessment of Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham's classification due to its involvement in combating ISIS and facilitating humanitarian efforts. Meanwhile, the Financial Times reported on the new authority in Syria's efforts to stabilize the region by managing former factions and addressing security concerns, including the threat posed by unexploded ordnance. Citizens continue to face daily dangers as the war's legacy lingers, with many homes affected by ongoing violence.
