The absence of a connection between the ceasefire and the release of hostages in the UN proposal may lead to a US veto, reflecting the Biden administration's stance on the issue.
The ongoing discussions about the US peace plan and the emphasis on freedom of movement for UNIFIL indicate a broader international effort to stabilize the region, although uncertainties remain in the negotiation process.
If the US vetoes the resolution, it could further strain relations between the US and other UN member states advocating for a ceasefire without preconditions.
The ongoing negotiations may lead to a revised proposal that incorporates the release of hostages, potentially paving the way for a more favorable outcome for all parties involved.
The UN Security Council is set to vote on a proposed resolution for a ceasefire in Gaza, led by a group of ten non-permanent member countries, with Guyana submitting the proposal. This resolution is significant as it does not explicitly connect the ceasefire to the release of hostages, which has been a key policy of the Biden administration. Israeli officials, including Ambassador Danny Danon, have expressed concerns that the US may veto the proposal if it does not include conditions for the release of the abductees, viewing it as a unilateral decision that abandons the hostages.
In parallel, Jean-Pierre Lacroix, head of UN peacekeeping operations, has commented on the encouraging signals regarding the US peace plan. He emphasized the importance of freedom of movement for UNIFIL and the need for genuine political will to implement UN resolution 1701, which outlines the framework for peace in the region. Lacroix's remarks highlight the ongoing negotiations and the complexities involved in reaching a comprehensive agreement.
