In a significant political development, 11 Israeli ministers have united in a demand to prevent the Red Cross from visiting Nohva terrorists imprisoned in Israel. This decision comes amid ongoing discussions about the treatment of Israeli abductees held by Hamas in Gaza. The ministers, led by Minister Orit Struck, argue that the Red Cross should prioritize visits to Israeli captives before engaging with the terrorists, emphasizing the importance of adhering to previously signed agreements regarding the treatment of abductees.
The High Court of Justice has recently issued a conditional order requiring the state to justify its stance against Red Cross visits to these security detainees. The ministers' letter to Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu highlights the urgency of fulfilling commitments to provide medication and care to Israeli hostages before any concessions are made to terrorists. The political and security cabinet is set to discuss this matter further, as tensions rise over Israel's approach to negotiations with Hamas.
Critics, including prominent figures like Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, have voiced strong opposition to the idea of allowing Red Cross visits to Nohva prisoners, claiming such actions undermine Israel's deterrent capabilities and could lead to increased unrest within prisons. The ongoing debate reflects broader concerns about national security and the complex dynamics of hostage negotiations.
- The demand from the ministers follows a controversial decision by the War Cabinet to allow visits to Nohva prisoners, a move that was met with significant backlash from various political factions and public organizations. The ministers assert that allowing the Red Cross to visit terrorists could embolden them and jeopardize the safety of Israeli citizens.
- The backdrop to this political maneuvering is the ongoing conflict with Hamas, particularly following the brutal attacks on October 7, which have heightened sensitivities around the treatment of both captives and detainees. The ministers' insistence on prioritizing Israeli abductees reflects a broader sentiment among the public and political leaders regarding national security and the integrity of Israel's sovereignty.
