In the ongoing conflict in Gaza, Israeli analysts are increasingly critical of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's steadfast position on the Philadelphi corridor. This area has become a focal point in discussions regarding the war's objectives, with Netanyahu asserting that maintaining control over the corridor is essential for achieving Israel's military goals. However, analysts argue that this insistence may hinder potential negotiations with Palestinian resistance groups in Gaza.
Military affairs analyst Nir Dvori from Channel 12 highlighted that the Philadelphi corridor has not posed a significant challenge for Israel throughout the eight months of conflict. He noted that, despite initial considerations, Netanyahu hesitated to authorize military operations in the area. Dvori pointed out that weapon smuggling has predominantly occurred through the Rafah crossing rather than the tunnels beneath the corridor, challenging the narrative that the Philadelphi corridor is crucial for security.
Political analysts, including Amnon Abramovich and Raviv Drucker, have raised questions about Netanyahu's strategy. Abramovich emphasized that Netanyahu had previously voted in favor of separating from the Gaza Strip without addressing the Philadelphi corridor's status. Drucker described Netanyahu's recent press conference as disheartening, suggesting that the Israeli public now understands that a prisoner exchange deal with Gaza is unlikely under current circumstances.
Additionally, the U.S. administration's stance on the situation has become increasingly critical. President Joe Biden's remarks indicate frustration with Netanyahu's approach, particularly concerning the Philadelphi corridor. Reports from American officials suggest a growing dissatisfaction with the Israeli government's actions, hinting at a potential shift in U.S. policy regarding the ongoing conflict.
