The Biden administration's limited success in addressing the Sudan crisis has led to increased scrutiny and calls for accountability from Congress.
The humanitarian situation in Sudan is dire, with millions displaced and facing severe hunger, highlighting the urgent need for effective international intervention.
The incoming Trump administration may shift US foreign policy towards a more regional mediation approach rather than direct involvement in the Sudan conflict.
Continued pressure from Congress may lead to more stringent measures against the RSF and increased humanitarian aid efforts in Sudan.
The US Congress has recognized the failure of the Biden administration's approach to the ongoing civil war in Sudan, prompting a series of legislative actions aimed at addressing the humanitarian crisis and holding accountable those responsible for atrocities. Recent discussions among G7 foreign ministers, including representatives from Egypt, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and the US, focused on achieving stability in Sudan through ceasefire efforts and humanitarian aid access. US envoy Tom Perriello's visit to Sudan highlighted the need for a roadmap to cease hostilities and facilitate emergency relief, as millions face severe hunger and displacement due to the conflict.
In response to the escalating violence, Rep. John James introduced a resolution condemning the atrocities committed by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) against non-Arab ethnic groups in Darfur. Additionally, bipartisan lawmakers in the Senate proposed the Sudan Accountability Act, which seeks to determine if the actions of Sudanese military forces constitute genocide or war crimes. Despite these efforts, a proposed halt to US arms sales to the UAE has seen limited support, reflecting the complexities of US foreign policy in the region.
Experts have expressed concerns that the Biden administration's diplomatic efforts have not met expectations, with calls for a stronger response to the conflict. As the political transition to the incoming Trump administration approaches, there are uncertainties about future US engagement in Sudan, with speculation that Trump may prioritize mediation among regional powers rather than direct intervention.
