China's support for Panama highlights the geopolitical tensions surrounding the Panama Canal, especially in the context of U.S.-China relations.
The protests in Panama reflect deep-seated national pride and historical grievances regarding U.S. control over the canal.
Increased diplomatic tensions between the U.S. and Panama could lead to a reevaluation of U.S. foreign policy in Central America.
China may seek to strengthen its economic ties with Panama, potentially increasing its influence in the region.
China Supports Panama Amid Trump’s Canal Control Threats
In a recent statement, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning expressed China's unwavering support for Panama's sovereignty over the Panama Canal. This declaration comes in response to remarks made by U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, who suggested that he might demand control of the canal if Panama does not lower tolls for American ships. Mao emphasized that the canal is a vital international maritime route and that its sovereignty belongs solely to Panama.
Panamanian President José Raúl Mulino has also firmly rejected Trump's claims, stating that the canal and its adjacent areas are non-negotiable parts of Panama's territory. He highlighted that the tariffs imposed on ships using the canal are not arbitrary but necessary for its management. Protests erupted in Panama City, where demonstrators expressed their anger towards Trump’s threats, chanting slogans like "Gringo Out" and burning effigies of the president-elect.
Historical Context of the Panama Canal
The Panama Canal, a crucial maritime passage connecting the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, has a complex history. Originally constructed by the United States and opened in 1914, control of the canal was transferred to Panama on December 31, 1999, following treaties signed in the late 1970s. These treaties established Panama's sovereignty over the canal while allowing the U.S. to ensure its neutrality.
Experts note that Trump's threats to reclaim control over the canal are largely symbolic, as the legal framework established by the treaties does not permit such actions without significant military intervention. The canal has been managed more efficiently under Panamanian control, with significant improvements made since the transfer of authority.
As tensions rise, both China and Panama are reinforcing their positions, with Beijing recognizing the canal as a neutral international route and Panama asserting its independence against external pressures.
