Scholz Defends Dialogue with Putin Amid Criticism
Chancellor Olaf Scholz of Germany has come under fire for his recent telephone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin, which marked their first communication in nearly two years. Speaking at Berlin's Schönefeld Airport before departing for the G20 summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Scholz emphasized Germany's steadfast commitment to supporting Ukraine. He stated, "Ukraine can count on us," and assured that no decisions regarding the war would be made without Kyiv's involvement. Scholz's defense of the call comes in light of ongoing criticism from Ukrainian officials and opposition parties in Germany, who argue that such diplomatic overtures may embolden Russia.
Ukraine's Response to Scholz's Phone Call
The reaction from Ukraine has been swift and critical. President Volodymyr Zelensky expressed concern that Scholz's conversation with Putin could open a "Pandora's box," undermining Western support for Ukraine. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk echoed these sentiments, stating that the recent Russian attacks demonstrated that phone diplomacy cannot replace tangible support for Ukraine. Scholz acknowledged the gravity of the situation, noting that the conversation revealed little change in Putin's stance on the war, which he described as "not good news."
Russia's Financial Strain and Military Losses
As the conflict continues, Russia faces significant military losses, with estimates suggesting over 716,000 casualties. In response to the financial strain of compensating wounded soldiers, President Putin has implemented cuts to compensation payments. A recent decree limits medical payments for injured soldiers to a maximum of three million rubles (approximately 28,000 euros), with lower payments for less severe injuries. This move reflects the Kremlin's efforts to manage its budget amid escalating costs associated with the war, which has also led to increased recruitment efforts, including bonuses for new soldiers. Reports indicate that some regions are reallocating social welfare funds to attract recruits, highlighting the dire economic implications of the ongoing conflict.
