Netanyahu's strategy in Gaza reflects a broader trend of privatization of military operations, raising ethical and legal concerns.
The involvement of private contractors in conflict zones often leads to a lack of accountability and adherence to international standards.
The plan to marginalize the Palestinian Authority in Gaza indicates a long-term vision for Israeli control in the region.
If Netanyahu's plan is implemented as outlined, Gaza may experience a significant shift in governance, potentially leading to increased instability.
The reliance on private militias could exacerbate violence and humanitarian crises in the region.
International backlash against privatized military control in Gaza may lead to diplomatic tensions for Israel.
The ongoing conflict in Gaza has seen significant destruction, particularly in the Jabalia refugee camp, as reported by Al Jazeera. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government faces criticism for its lack of a coherent vision for Gaza, yet Haaretz's deputy editor, Noa Landau, argues that Netanyahu is indeed following a deliberate policy, albeit one that is not openly communicated. Landau highlights that Netanyahu's strategy involves the de facto annexation of large areas of Gaza, with a focus on expelling residents and establishing military infrastructure. She reveals that the Israeli government plans to transfer civil control of Gaza to private companies, specifically those without ties to terrorist organizations, with the Israeli army overseeing humanitarian aid. This privatization of military control raises concerns about adherence to international law and the long-term implications for Gaza's governance. Landau warns that this approach could lead to a situation similar to Iraq post-occupation, which would have dire consequences for the region.
