Gabriel Attal Questions New Immigration Law Priorities
In a recent statement, former Prime Minister Gabriel Attal expressed skepticism regarding the new immigration law announced by the government, which is set to be reviewed by Parliament in early 2025. Speaking on France Inter, Attal stated, "Making a law for the sake of a law, without explaining to us what would be in it, does not seem totally a priority to me." He emphasized that the focus should be on the content of the law rather than the mere act of legislation.
Attal pointed out that a comprehensive immigration law was adopted less than a year ago and many measures from that law are still awaiting implementation due to pending decrees. He argued that before rushing into creating new legislation, the government should clarify the specific provisions it intends to include.
Government's Rationale for the New Immigration Law
The new immigration law aims to extend the administrative detention period for illegal immigrants deemed dangerous from the current 90 days to 210 days. This extension has been justified by government spokesperson Maud Bregeon, who highlighted the need for enhanced measures to protect the public. However, Attal countered this argument by referencing previous legislative changes that had already increased the detention period from 45 to 90 days.
Attal's comments reflect a broader concern about the government's approach to immigration policy, suggesting that the focus should be on effective implementation of existing laws rather than introducing new legislation without clear justification. He stated, "What is a priority is to act so that the State can truly control who enters and leaves the country."
Controversy Surrounding Education Budget Cuts
In addition to immigration issues, Attal also addressed the government's proposed budget cuts in the education sector, which includes the elimination of 4,000 teaching positions, primarily in nursery and elementary schools. While he acknowledged the need for budgetary discussions, he stressed that educational priorities must remain at the forefront of these debates. The proposed cuts have sparked outrage among unions, who have labeled them as a significant threat to public education. Attal's nuanced stance highlights the delicate balance the government must strike between fiscal responsibility and maintaining quality education.
