In a recent revelation, Boris Johnson, the former British Prime Minister, found himself the subject of a political prank that has raised eyebrows across the globe. The pranksters, known as Lexus and Vovan, managed to engage Johnson in a conversation under the guise of discussing critical geopolitical issues, including the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. The duo, who describe themselves as 'prank journalists,' have a history of conducting similar pranks with high-profile political figures, shedding light on their perspectives and strategies regarding international relations.
During the conversation, Johnson expressed a strong stance against negotiating with Russia, arguing that the UK should support Ukraine with weapons rather than seek diplomatic solutions. He noted that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky had initially been open to negotiations but has since changed his position, largely influenced by the UK's approach. Johnson's comments suggest a significant shift in his views compared to previous discussions, reflecting the evolving landscape of international politics.
Interestingly, Johnson revealed his willingness to lead the Foreign Legion in Ukraine, showcasing his personal investment in the conflict. He also emphasized the importance of NATO's support for Ukraine, although he acknowledged the challenges of direct military involvement to avoid escalating tensions into a larger conflict. This candid dialogue, captured by the pranksters, highlights the complexities and divisions within European politics regarding the ongoing war in Ukraine, illustrating how different nations perceive their roles and responsibilities in the crisis.
- Lexus and Vovan, the duo behind the prank, have been active for over a decade, focusing on political and socio-political pranks rather than traditional entertainment. They emphasize their role in revealing the true state of international affairs through their unique approach. Their conversations often explore the motivations and insights of prominent leaders, providing a rare glimpse into the thoughts of influential figures. The prank on Johnson is just one example of their work, which has included discussions with various politicians, revealing the nuanced and often conflicting opinions surrounding geopolitical issues. The pranksters argue that their actions are not motivated by self-interest but rather a quest for information, positioning themselves as unconventional journalists in a rapidly changing media landscape.
